formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone project
Review the Topic Materials and the work completed in NRS-433V to formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone project. My topic is stroke
A PICOT starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention should be an independent, specified nursing change intervention. The intervention cannot require a provider prescription. Include a comparison to a patient population not currently receiving the intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process.
Formulate a PICOT statement using the PICOT format provided in the assigned readings. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project.
In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.
Make sure to address the following on the PICOT statement:
Evidence-Based Solution
Nursing Intervention
Patient Care
Health Care Agency
Nursing Practice
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.
A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:
Title page
Introduction section
A comparison of research questions
A comparison of sample populations
A comparison of the limitations of the study
A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.
Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:
Background
Problem statement
Purpose of the change proposal
PICOT
Literature search strategy employed
Evaluation of the literature
Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created
Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate re
Benchmark: Research Critique and PICOT Statement Final Draft
One of the major current challenges in the field of health care, including nursing practice and nursing science, is to develop and promote evidence-based practice (Adamsen, 2003). Patient education is a supported method of not only increasing patient functionality and quality of life, but also reducing re-admission rates and acute care center resource utilization (Rothrock et al., 2006). The purpose of this paper is to revise the PICOT statement, critique article and provide evidence based change in nursing practice on educating patient and family status post stroke.
PICOT Statement
Population or the problem
As increase in cases of recurrent of stroke due to poor education on specific of disease process by nurses and health care providers. According to Ho & Yan “The three areas which should be addressed in education for patients with chronic illness are disease prevention, disease-specific education, and self-management”. Therefore, lack of information of the disease process by this patient increase recurrent of stroke.
Intervention
The intervention proposed in the study is to reduce the number of recurrent stroke re-admission to the hospital. Studies have shown that educating patient and family member reduces stroke reoccurrence. Also, it helps family members to knowledge of the disease, and understand the patient risk factors involved with stroke (Visser-Meily et al., 2006). Nurses educating patient and family member will help them to manage their disease at home and reduce readmission.
Comparison
The intervention will be compared to adult patient with education on stroke and with no recurrent and or readmission to the hospital. Nurses should educate patient on the first time of diagnosis of stroke during admission.
Outcome and time
By educating patient status post stroke and their family members on the importance of the disease, management, and coping skills will reduce the number of recurrent of the disease and will also reduce readmission to the hospital. Also, patient will know the risk factors involved about the recurrent stroke, and have quality life. The outcome will measure over a period of six months- one year. The PICOT question: Population of patient 18 and older diagnosed with stroke(P), what is the effect of poor education by nurse to patient diagnosed with stroke, (I), on recurrent of stroke/readmission (C) compared with adult patient diagnosed with education on stroke with no recurrent/readmission, (O)within a period six month-one year. (Cameron, 2013)
Adamsen L, Larsen K, Bjarregaard L, Madsen J. Moving forward in a role as a researcher: the effect of the research method course on nurses ‘research activity. J Clin Nurse 2003; 12: 442–50.
Cameron, V. (2013). Best Practices for Stroke Patient and Family Education in the Acute Care Setting. MEDSURG Nursing , 51-55. Visser-Meily, A., Post, M., Gorter, J., Berlekom, S.T, Van Den Bos, T, & Lindeman, E. (2006). Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centered approach. Disability & Rehabilitation, 28(24), 1557-1561.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
